Building Social Safety and Culture in Higher Education

This case study explores how a higher education institution with international staff and students addressed cultural and social safety challenges. While the academic environment was dynamic and supportive, underlying issues such as gossip, microaggressions, hierarchy, and lack of feedback undermined trust. By uncovering hidden cultural patterns and creating space for dialogue, the organization built a stronger foundation for inclusivity, safety, and collaboration.

The Challenge

A higher education organization with international staff and students faced pressing questions around culture and social safety. Despite a supportive and dynamic academic environment, challenges emerged: onboarding was inconsistent, gossip and microaggressions created insecurity, hierarchy limited open dialogue, and conflicts often remained unresolved. Employees expressed a need for clear rules, safe spaces for feedback, and more transparency in leadership communication.

Our Approach

We started with intake sessions and qualitative research, including in-depth interviews and cultural observations. By listening to micro-stories, we uncovered the hidden patterns: how informal rules shaped belonging, how gossip functioned both positively and negatively, and how competition versus collaboration was experienced. We facilitated dialogue sessions and campfire conversations where staff could reflect together on these patterns, openly discuss challenges, and co-create new ways of working.

Students collaborating outdoors on campus with laptops and notes

Cultural Insights

Our anthropological analysis revealed key cultural dynamics:

  • Onboarding improved with a buddy system, but more guidance was needed around social expectations.
  • Gossip and humor often bonded groups but could also harm feelings of safety.
  • A gap existed between informal advising and formal complaints, leaving incidents unaddressed.
  • Feedback culture was underdeveloped, leading to unresolved tension.
  • Hierarchy and power dynamics made it difficult to share vulnerabilities or challenge the system.

The Outcome

Through joint reflection and dialogue, the organization gained a clearer picture of its culture and safety dynamics. Employees now have language to discuss sensitive issues, managers are more aware of their influence, and transparent agreements around feedback and behavior are being introduced. The campfire sessions built trust, reinforced inclusivity, and strengthened the foundation for a safe, collaborative academic culture.

Culture always exists between people. People are constantly on the move and cause change themselves. Every change has an impact. Culture is a temporary landing place in the midst of changes and systems. The current culture provides tools and information about the meaning that people and teams collectively give to things and events. Analyzing and understanding culture is necessary to initiate positive change. Insight and clarity as the basis for change.

Want to know more about culture, change and leadership? I’ll be happy to help you.

Share this post

Related